Animal politics

The Humane Society Legislative Fund, which never has endorsed a candidate for president, says the needs of animals make it critical to do so this year. They picked Barack Obama, who doesn’t even own a pet (yet).

Obama, however, has promised his family a dog in November, win or lose, which led AKC members to step up in a fun poll and choose that dog for him. AKC members’ vote? Get the kids a poodle.

Why choose petless Obama (shown here after a rally with anti-puppy mill spokespoodle, “Baby”) over John McCain, who has 24 pets among his various residences?

The Fund’s president, Michael Markarian, explains why it decided to take this unusual step:

One of the guiding principles of the Humane Society Legislative Fund is that we evaluate candidates based on a single criterion: where they stand on animal protection policies. We don

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Animal politics

  1. op99 says:

    Not to mention that Obama didn’t pick a vice presidential nominee who champions shooting wolves from airplanes. Not humane – not even sporting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>